Walls of Hate and Fear
My heart is breaking once again over the hatred I see in the Christian Church. I have been reading quite a bit of opinion over the recent invitation and un-invitation of Shane Claiborne to Cedarville University. The commentary is shocking and sad, a clear picture of the walls we build to bunker ourselves from each other and things we don't understand or don't want to understand.
Shane Claiborne has chosen a radical form of sharing the Gospel by living in community, called The Simple Way, in the slums of Philadelphia. I have followed his ministry with interest since I have very good friends doing similar ministry in Vancouver and I also worked with people from Servants to Asia's Urban Poor in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Critics call this type of ministry as heretical since it does not start with proclamation of the Gospel, just all love-centered. There are even blogs (ironically ones that do not invite comments) that have been devoted to "Shane-bashing," warning Christians of his occult-like practices and "wish to teach false doctrine."
Bloggers all have their right to opinions and each have their own quirks and unique ways of expressing themselves. In fact some of the arguments I see in the blogging-sphere end up skipping the issues for conflicts over personalities and methods of communication. Blogging, however, can provide a forum for healthy discussion of issues. But there are people who would rather not engage the issues or discuss practices or theology; they would rather just attack the person and label them into a box so they can say anything they want and understand as little as they wish. To me this is scandalous and unfair. It is immature and harmful.
Quite honestly, I am sick of the bashing. I am sick of the labels. I am sick of the FEAR and HATRED that we promote when we stoop to such behavior -- attacking fellow Christians who have chosen diverse ways to follow Jesus and make Him known. Why can't we accept that the Spirit may lead each of us to do that in different ways?
I, for one, do not feel arrogant enough to damn another brother or sister to Hell for the ways they follow Christ. Yet I see that very thing happening in blogs that lump men such as Ron Sider, Tony Compolo, Brian McClaren and Jim Wallis together as those who are propagating heresy. Do I agree with all the perspectives of Pat Robertson or James Dobson? Certainly not. But do I think they are going to Hell for the views they propagate? Absolutely not! They, too, are doing good work for the Kingdom. Is there any way we can share our views together as Christians without stooping to name calling and stone-throwing?
I am sick when I read the labels we use as bricks in walls we mortar with hate: left-wing, right-wing, conservatives, radicals, liberals, progressivists, humanists, heretics, emergents, uncompassionates, fundamentalists, post-evangelicals, relativists, etc. . . . and I've heard plenty of denominational labels to divide us too. Rather than look for Christ in the other, we assume He is not there and use labels to prove it. I just wish we would stop it -- it is so childish to live in mortal fear of ideas and faith practices. (thus my picture of Dr. Seuss's book, The Butter Battle). We prove again and again that we have no trust in the Spirit when we allow such behavior to exist in our ranks.
I was shocked to read Pastor Silva at Apprising Ministries, who uses Scripture to warn the Church, "the time we live is not a time for unity; it is a time for division." His site is dedicated to pointing out "heretics" who are infiltrating the Church. Yet, in his, perhaps well-meaning, efforts to use Scripture to boost his ambitions, he defeats the very prayer Jesus prayed in John 17. My heart breaks when I see examples such as his.
Shame on US all! Satan is having a hay-day seeing us Christians bicker and fight. WE are to be the CHURCH together!!! Or did Jesus only pray for certain parts of the Church? I know I cannot spend lots of time on such sadness; it can quickly drag me down. But reading about it reminds me that no matter what conversations we promote or how much understanding we beg, it is only through steadfast prayer that any inroads toward unity can ever be made. When will we ever truly be able to celebrate the resurrection of Christ's broken Body together?
Shane Claiborne has chosen a radical form of sharing the Gospel by living in community, called The Simple Way, in the slums of Philadelphia. I have followed his ministry with interest since I have very good friends doing similar ministry in Vancouver and I also worked with people from Servants to Asia's Urban Poor in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Critics call this type of ministry as heretical since it does not start with proclamation of the Gospel, just all love-centered. There are even blogs (ironically ones that do not invite comments) that have been devoted to "Shane-bashing," warning Christians of his occult-like practices and "wish to teach false doctrine."
Bloggers all have their right to opinions and each have their own quirks and unique ways of expressing themselves. In fact some of the arguments I see in the blogging-sphere end up skipping the issues for conflicts over personalities and methods of communication. Blogging, however, can provide a forum for healthy discussion of issues. But there are people who would rather not engage the issues or discuss practices or theology; they would rather just attack the person and label them into a box so they can say anything they want and understand as little as they wish. To me this is scandalous and unfair. It is immature and harmful.
Quite honestly, I am sick of the bashing. I am sick of the labels. I am sick of the FEAR and HATRED that we promote when we stoop to such behavior -- attacking fellow Christians who have chosen diverse ways to follow Jesus and make Him known. Why can't we accept that the Spirit may lead each of us to do that in different ways?
I, for one, do not feel arrogant enough to damn another brother or sister to Hell for the ways they follow Christ. Yet I see that very thing happening in blogs that lump men such as Ron Sider, Tony Compolo, Brian McClaren and Jim Wallis together as those who are propagating heresy. Do I agree with all the perspectives of Pat Robertson or James Dobson? Certainly not. But do I think they are going to Hell for the views they propagate? Absolutely not! They, too, are doing good work for the Kingdom. Is there any way we can share our views together as Christians without stooping to name calling and stone-throwing?
I am sick when I read the labels we use as bricks in walls we mortar with hate: left-wing, right-wing, conservatives, radicals, liberals, progressivists, humanists, heretics, emergents, uncompassionates, fundamentalists, post-evangelicals, relativists, etc. . . . and I've heard plenty of denominational labels to divide us too. Rather than look for Christ in the other, we assume He is not there and use labels to prove it. I just wish we would stop it -- it is so childish to live in mortal fear of ideas and faith practices. (thus my picture of Dr. Seuss's book, The Butter Battle). We prove again and again that we have no trust in the Spirit when we allow such behavior to exist in our ranks.
I was shocked to read Pastor Silva at Apprising Ministries, who uses Scripture to warn the Church, "the time we live is not a time for unity; it is a time for division." His site is dedicated to pointing out "heretics" who are infiltrating the Church. Yet, in his, perhaps well-meaning, efforts to use Scripture to boost his ambitions, he defeats the very prayer Jesus prayed in John 17. My heart breaks when I see examples such as his.
Shame on US all! Satan is having a hay-day seeing us Christians bicker and fight. WE are to be the CHURCH together!!! Or did Jesus only pray for certain parts of the Church? I know I cannot spend lots of time on such sadness; it can quickly drag me down. But reading about it reminds me that no matter what conversations we promote or how much understanding we beg, it is only through steadfast prayer that any inroads toward unity can ever be made. When will we ever truly be able to celebrate the resurrection of Christ's broken Body together?
Lord, have mercy on your Church.
Christ, have mercy.
Christ, have mercy.
6 Comments:
GG,
You said: "he defeats the very prayer Jesus prayed in John 17." 1) Christ's will cannot be defeated; and 2) your understanding of John 17 needs to be balanced by 1 Corinthians 11:18-19.
The message shared by Campolo and Claiborne here is not the Gospel of Jesus Christ, it is wishful thinking:
Shane Claiborne and the Gospel of Goodness
http://www.apprising.org/archives
/2008/02/shane_claiborne_4.html
And there is a lot more to the various labors in Christ of which He has made me an overseer than you seem to know:
What Are You Doing?
http://www.apprising.org/archives
/2008/02/am_mailbag_what.html
By Ken Silva, at 9:45 AM, February 18, 2008
Thanks Gecko Girl for your post! It does seem like there's quite a bit of anger over a skinny kid from Tennessee who moved to Philly & try to love people like Jesus did. Ironic, but no worries. The angry people can stay angry and the rest of us can act in love to make change happen together.
Peace to you.
By Anonymous, at 12:15 PM, February 18, 2008
Thank you, anonymous, for your comments.
And thank you, Pastor Silva, for kindly restating your convictions. While I do see a need for shepherds and watchmen for the Church, I have a hard time seeing how demonizing individuals is an appropriate means to share warning.
And as for 1 Cor. 11, I do not see Paul "balancing" out anything Jesus prayed for in John 17, rather reinforcing the need for the church to be careful not to allow unworthy practice of the Lord's Supper to cause unholy division in the Body. I realize that some scholars interpret vs. 19 as speaking of the end times, and perhaps that is your interpretation as well, but I don't think it should be our "mission" to cause division just to see who comes out on top. In both the Gospels and in Paul's letters there are references to the "fruit" that we bear in our lives, the place we look to see if they are truly abiding in Christ. We can judge the message of Christ by the fruit it bears.
And as for "wishful thinking," yes, perhaps in a different way, Claiborne and Compolo's vision for the Church is wishful thinking . . . a Church that is working in unity to make the redemption of Christ real to all the world. With all due respect, it sure beats a vision for a Church that is broken, scared and divided.
By Gecko Girl, at 1:45 PM, February 18, 2008
Hi GG,
I for one am happy there is a renegotiation going on in the Church about what the Gospel is: is it pray a prayer to get individual ass (feel free to change this word if you prefer to have a 'cleaner' site) to heaven or is it a holistic restoration of all of creation through Jesus, including individuals AND broken social structures.
While I don't know the details of this decision and even Christian media can slant a story, I think Dr. Ruby's explanation is telling.
thanks for your perspective and bravo for reaching the ken-silva-commenting worthy status :)
By Anonymous, at 2:44 PM, February 18, 2008
"holistic restoration of all of creation through Jesus"
Amen! Thank you, Jeremy,
Romans 8:18-25 and Col 1:18-23 have been my personal mission for many years now and I agree should really be seen as the mission of the Church, the Good News we have to offer!
By Gecko Girl, at 3:28 PM, February 18, 2008
AMEN! AMEN! and AMEN!
Thanks for calling us again to live and respond to each other in Christ-like ways.
Thanks for your gracious, non-defensive posture.
In all these expressions of slandar and protectionism in the name of Christ, I think of the words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount.
"Thus you will know them by their fruits." Matthew 7:20
By Anonymous, at 5:28 PM, February 18, 2008
Post a Comment
<< Home